Financial settlements in divorce refer to the process by which a couple’s joint assets and finances are divided upon the dissolution of their marriage. This often complex and emotionally charged process aims to ensure that both parties receive a fair share of the marital assets. However, numerous divorce myths and misconceptions surrounding financial settlements can lead to misunderstandings and unrealistic expectations. Believing these myths can be risky and may result in unfavourable outcomes. Therefore, it is crucial to separate fact from fiction to navigate the financial aspects of divorce more effectively. More importantly contact a specialist lawyer or financial accountant at Fair Result who will advise you the best ways to deal with financial separation on divorce.
Myths to Debunk
Myth 1: “Everything is split 50/50 in a divorce”
A common misconception is that marital assets are automatically divided equally between spouses in a divorce. The division of assets is based on what is deemed fair and just, which does not necessarily mean a 50/50 split. Courts consider various factors, such as the length of the marriage, each spouse’s financial contributions, future earning potential, and the needs of any children involved. The goal is to achieve an equitable distribution, which may result in one party receiving a larger share of the assets. The courts will also often look at spousal maintenance. There has long been a misconception that spousal maintenance will always be paid. This spousal maintenance misconception is wrong and maintenance will only be paid for as long as it is necessary to allow the party receiving it to adjust to single living again.
Myth 2: “The higher-earning spouse always pays spousal maintenance”
Another prevalent myth is that the spouse who earns more money will always be required to pay spousal maintenance to the lower-earning spouse. While the higher-earning spouse may be ordered to provide financial support, this is not a given. Courts consider multiple factors when determining maintenance, including the length of the marriage, the standard of living during the marriage, and each spouse’s financial resources and needs. In some cases, no maintenance may be awarded if both parties are deemed capable of supporting themselves.
Myth 3: “You can hide assets to avoid sharing them”
Some individuals believe they can conceal assets to prevent them from being included in the financial settlement. However, this is both illegal and unethical. Courts require full financial disclosure from both parties at the outset on a disclosure form known as Form E, and failure to disclose all assets can result in severe legal consequences. Methods of hiding assets, such as transferring money to friends or family or undervaluing property, are likely to be uncovered during this process. If hidden assets are discovered, the court may impose penalties, and the guilty party could face criminal charges.
Myth 4: “The parent with custody gets the house”
It is often assumed that the parent who receives primary custody of the children will automatically be awarded the family home. While the needs of the children are a significant consideration, the decision to award the house is based on various factors. Courts will evaluate each party’s financial situation, the ability to maintain the home, and the best interests of the children. In some cases, the house may be sold, and the proceeds divided, or the custodial parent may be allowed to stay in the home until the children reach a certain age. This is known as a Mescher Order, and you will need advice from a lawyer to obtain this as property division in divorce is complex to ensure each parties needs are met with the courts first priority being to ensure the children of the marriage are safely housed.
Myth 5: “You need to go to court to finalise a settlement”
Many people believe that financial settlements can only be resolved through a court process. However, there are alternative methods to resolve financial disputes that can be less stressful and more cost-effective. Mediation and collaborative divorce are two popular alternatives where both parties work together with the help of a neutral third party to reach an agreement. These methods allow for more control over the outcome and can often result in a quicker and more amicable resolution. However, even if mediators are used you will still need to get a lawyer to draft the financial consent order for approval by the court. if you use a mediator that is not a qualified lawyer you will still need the lawyer to submit the consent order and supporting documentation to the government portal for approval by a judge. You do not need to attend court for this. The online process will deal with this for you.
Addressing Common Questions
What are the most common misconceptions people have about financial settlements?
The divorce myths mentioned above are among the most common misconceptions in financial disclosure on divorce. Additionally, people may believe that only marital assets are subject to division (when, in fact, non-marital assets can sometimes be considered) or that prenuptial agreements are always upheld without question.
How do courts determine a fair settlement?
Courts determine a fair settlement by considering several factors, including the length of the marriage, each spouse’s contributions, both financial and non-financial, the standard of living during the marriage, and the future financial needs and earning potential of each spouse. The primary goal is to ensure that both parties can maintain a reasonable standard of living post-divorce.
What legal requirements are involved in disclosing assets?
Both parties are legally required to provide full and frank disclosure of all assets, liabilities, income, and expenses. This information is typically exchanged through financial statements Form E and supporting documentation including payslips bank statements and details of properties you feel would be suitable for your post-divorce settlement. Failure to disclose assets can lead to serious legal repercussions, including fines, penalties, or having the settlement overturned. Fair Result can help you complete all this paperwork
Are there alternatives to court for resolving financial disputes?
Yes, alternatives to court include mediation, collaborative divorce, and arbitration. These methods involve working with neutral third parties to reach an agreement outside of the traditional court setting. They can be less adversarial and more efficient, allowing couples to maintain greater control over the outcome.
What are the consequences of believing or acting on these myths?
Believing or acting on divorce myths about financial settlements can lead to unrealistic expectations, prolonged disputes, and unfavourable outcomes. Misconceptions can result in unnecessary stress, increased legal costs, and potential legal penalties for unethical behaviour such as hiding assets which could ultimately lead to prison. It is always best to have all your divorce myths dispelled and get legal advice about the best way to proceed from one of the team at Fair Result.
Conclusion
Understanding the realities of financial settlements in divorce is crucial for making informed decisions and achieving a fair outcome. By debunking common myths, individuals can better navigate the complexities of divorce and avoid common pitfalls. For expert advice and guidance, readers are encouraged to contact Fair Result or use our WhatsApp service. Each client receives their own WhatsApp group where they can ask questions of the team at Fair Result anytime if they have questions or concerns over their case. Navigating divorce with accurate information and professional support can make a significant difference in achieving a fair and amicable resolution.
Get in Touch
Call us at 07 500 933 818 or 0333 577 7009
